ACTIVITIES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
During the implementation phase of this project, various activities have been carried out, including:
– TRANSNATIONAL MEETINGS
– FIRST TRANSNATIONAL MEETING (M1):
It was held in Valencia (Spain) on March 30th 2019; the leaders and coordinators of the partner entities participated in it, and it was hosted by Redtree Making Projects Coop.V.
The meeting agenda focused on the following aspects:
— Introduction of the participants.
— Introduction of the project “LOOKING OUT FOR A SCHOOL FOR ALL: EARLY EDUCATIONAL INCLUSION FOR STUDENTS WITH LOW VISION”, which included:
— The Partners Agreements, which each entity signed before the meeting.
— Safety and Good Practice Plans.
— Defining the visual line of the project (logo, color guides, etc.).
— Creating the Project website.
— Present and specify the Intellectual Outputs of the project
— Establish the schedule, activities, and tasks of the project to be carried out.
— An on-site evaluation of the previous meeting / phase.
The documents drafted for this meeting were: an agenda of it, a project summary, power point presentations of the project and the results by Redtree and ALBA (as coordinating entities of the Intellectual Outputs), a visibility dossier (including a poster of the meeting, a banner for the websites, a press release…); and supporting documentation: registration and special needs surveys, signature sheets, certificates, and collection of documents to prove the attendance of the participants (such as plane tickets).
The project was showcased and its importance and impact for children with aniridia and albinism was highlighted. All entities come from the agreement in the existing lack of mechanisms for inclusion in such early ages.
The partner entities shared some personal experiences, how obstacles derived from vision impairment hinder their daily activities and learning, etc. This exchange of experiences contributed to enriching the project, since it is essential that the Intellectual Outputs provide a useful answer to the needs of the beneficiaries.
– SECOND TRANSNATIONAL MEETING (M2):
Held in Sandefjord (Norway), hosted by Anirida Norge and Aniridia Europe on September 14th 2019, with the participation of the leaders of the project’s partner organization and the persons in charge of the Intellectual Outputs. The meeting agenda focused on the following topics:
— Introduction of the project “LOOKING OUT FOR A SCHOOL FOR ALL: EARLY EDUCATIONAL INCLUSION FOR STUDENTS WITH LOW VISION” and doing an EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCES AND KNOWLEDGE among the partner entities on educational adaptations for children.
— The progress made in the Intellectual Outputs of the project was shown:
a) The O1 – VIRTUAL TRAINING COURSE FOR TEACHERS AND EARLY EDUCATION SHCOOLS FOR THE INCLUSION OF STUDENTS WITH VISUAL DISABILITIES IN THEIR CLASSROOMS was presented and discussed regarding index and first contents.
b) The O2 – EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE: ICT TOOL FOR THE INCLUSION OF STUDENTS WITH VISUAL DISABILITIES IN THE CLASSROOMS was demonstrated at the internal functioning level.
— Review and confirmation of the project schedule, upcoming meetings, activities, and tasks to be performed.
— Mid-term and on-site evaluation of the meeting.
At this meeting, each representative presented and explained the main activities, objectives, and projects of their organization, especially focusing on educational matters; progress was reviewed, and an EXCHANGE OF EXPERIENCES AND KNOWLEDGE among the partners regarding educational adaptations for children was carried out.
The project’s schedule, upcoming meetings, activities, and tasks to be carried out are reviewed and confirmed. Among other aspects, the dates of the following meetings (M3 Italia and M4 Valencia) are set, and the final schedules of the pilot tests of the two results and multiplier events are established. Specific tasks and activities are agreed for the next transnational meeting in Italy, and the Intermediate evaluation of this second Transnational Meeting is carried out: the entities of beneficiaries valued the future results of the project very positively.
This concludes an assessment shared by the entities such as the strengthening of the alliances and trusts of the intersectorial network, insisting on the good work done to achieve the objective of training early childhood education professionals so they can Successfully address the challenges of making their classrooms inclusive for children with visual impairment.
Redtree stated that the dissemination dossier was already prepared, which incorporates materials for the visibility of the project, with the modification incorporated in its websites and social networks. This is available in the dropbox shared by the project entities and will be updated according to the progress of the project.
All organizations agreed to seek among their national and European contacts networks more organizations interested in the results of the project, to improve the impact of the project.
– OTHER ACTIVITIES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION STAGE
PROCESS 4 – COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RELEVANT EUROPEAN REGULATIONS
A19- An analysis of the needs and European curricula of early childhood education was carried out.
A20- All European laws and regulations of special interest to the Project were analyzed in depth.
PROCESS 5 – O1 INTELLECTUAL OUTPUT DEVELOPMENT
The first 3 activities related to the development of this product have already been developed.
– O1-A4.- Creation of the different materials that make up the three blocks of the course: At this time this activity is in the process of development, having advanced in the creation of the materials and contents of the course but not yet being completed.
– O1-A5.- Adaptation of the training course to the structure of the e-Learning platform: This activity has begun and is in the process of development, it is expected to be completed in the month of March approximately, as planned.
PROCESS 6 – O2 INTELLECTUAL OUTPUT DEVELOPMENT
In the process for the development of O2, the first 4 planned activities have already been carried out, being currently working on the programming of the ICT resource, which constitutes activity 5, and the last two are pending evaluation by the teachers and pilot tests with students.
PROCESS 7 – Development of the “Methodological guide for the adaptation of a children’s education center”.
A21- Compilation of proposals and suggestions for the development of the guide, based on the experience of social and collaborating entities.
PROCESS 8 – COORDINATION, EVALUATION, AND MONITORING
A22- Monthly virtual coordination meetings for the evaluation and monitoring of the activities carried out.
M1 and M2- The first two transnational meetings have been held.
PROCESS 9 – VISIBILITY OF THE PROJECT
A23- Design of the Project image and materials for visibility and dissemination.
A24- Face-to-face activities to present the Project to other stakeholders.
A25- Activities for online visibility of the Project (www.schoolforall.eu).
METHODOLOGY OF THE IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
The methodology applied in this project was based on 3 basic pillars: to enhance an active involvement and equal participation of all partners in the development of the project’s results and activities, to ensure the highest possible quality in the results, and to boost innovation in the development of Intellectual Outputs.
According to these criteria, a systemic planning methodology has been designed, capable of completely defining the project, its tasks and people in charge, while generating a collaborative monitoring and working system that allows each member, collaborator or participant to provide the best of themselves while learning from the strengths of others.
According to this systemic methodology, we consider that reality in general, and this project in particular, is made up of processes and sub-processes that must be analyzed in a particular way to define their whole. In order to guarantee the highest quality results possible and really useful pedagogical materials, the project has been divided into four levels:
1. Processes: the set of activities to reach an objective and/or specific result.
2. Activities: the set of events, meetings, material development sessions, etc. needed to complete a process
3. Tasks: sets of actions necessary to carry out an activity.
4. Leaders and participants: people in charge of carrying out the tasks.
THE PRINCE2 METHODOLOGY
This systemic methodology is based on the project management methodology “PRINCE 2”, adapting it to the management of European projects and specifically to this project. Unlike the traditional approach, this methodology is based on the product, so its processes are focused on obtaining specific results rather than on planning activities, which makes it better suited for the management of innovation projects like this one.
One of the main objectives of this methodology is to turn projects with a significant load of variability and uncertainty into controlled environments to minimize risks and facilitate its management.
This methodology covers essential aspects of the Project such as: quality, changes, its role structure (organization), its plans (how much, how, and when), its risks and progress, viability, and also the monitoring and continuous evaluation throughout its lifecycle.
The “PRINCE2” methodology is based on the following 7 principles, useful not only for the project, but for the entire organization in which it is developed:
– A continuous justification
This ensures that there is a justifiable reason to start the project.
It remains valid throughout the project’s lifespan.
It has been identified and approved.
– Learning from experience
Previous experiences are collected, obtained throughout the execution of the project, along with the lessons learned at the end of it.
– Clearly defined roles and responsibilities
This ensures that the interests of the project’s users, partners and its coordinator are represented in the decision making processes.
– Management by stages
Every project following this methodology is planned, monitored and controlled by stages.
– Management by exception
This means to delegate enough authority from one management level to the next, giving autonomy according to established capabilities (schedule, cost, quality, scope, benefit and/or risk) so that, if these capabilities are exceeded, the superior level is consulted on how to act.
It focuses on the definition and submission of products and results, meaning that a project is not a set of tasks to be carried out, but the submission products and results (developed after carrying out the necessary tasks).
This ensures that the “PRINCE2” methodology and the controls to be applied are based on the size, complexity, relevance, capabilities and risk level of the project.